Tension at INEC HQ as Protesters Clash Over ADC Leadership Crisis

Juliet Ezeh

A potential breakdown of order was narrowly avoided at the headquarters of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) as rival groups of protesters nearly clashed over the commission’s decision to delist the leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC).

The tension stems from INEC’s move to withdraw recognition of the National Working Committee led by David Mark, a development that has sparked sharp reactions and deepened divisions among party supporters.

Although both pro- and anti-INEC groups had planned mass protests at the commission’s headquarters, a heavy security presence around the area effectively restricted access, preventing a full-scale confrontation. Only one faction—supporters of INEC’s decision—eventually mobilised at the scene.

By mid-morning, the situation escalated as youths backing the electoral body gathered near the premises, warning against any attempt to disrupt activities at INEC. The demonstrators insisted that aggrieved parties should seek legal redress rather than resort to protests that could destabilise public order.

Speaking on behalf of Concerned Nigerian Youth, Adeyeye Olugbenga condemned moves by opposing groups to occupy the commission’s office, describing such actions as a threat to democratic stability.

He maintained that INEC acted within the law by complying with a court ruling that led to the derecognition of the ADC leadership, stressing that any dissatisfaction should be addressed through judicial channels.

Olugbenga also criticised what he described as increasing attacks on INEC, warning that such actions could undermine public confidence in the country’s electoral system at a sensitive time.

He reaffirmed the group’s readiness to defend democratic institutions, stating that Nigerian youths would continue to mobilise in support of INEC against any attempt to incite unrest or disrupt its operations.

The incident highlights rising political tension surrounding party leadership disputes and underscores the fragile balance between civic expression and public order, especially as legal battles continue to shape Nigeria’s political landscape.